The University of Colorado in Boulder started a projected examining the tall grass prairies that use to thrive throughout the middle of this country. Of course, today, very little of this original prairie grass is still around. The researchers collected 31 samples of the original prairie grass. The majority of samples came from nature preserves and graveyards.
Much like what we have been doing in class the last couple of weeks, the researchers used DNA sequencing to identify the bacteria that is predominant in these native grasses. The bacteria identified is Verrucomicrobia, which is not very well known. The goal of this project is to examine this bacteria and see what role it played in the in prairie growth. Their experiments have also revealed that the different samples also have different bacterial make up. They would like to reconstruct what this land use to look like prior to human arrival and interactions.
Although it is a very new study, it offers great potential for new understanding of what the land use to be before people transformed the land for crops growth. If this bacteria can be studied and reintroduced into the environment and maybe regrow the tall grass prairies, to an extent. But would people be interested in walking through an environment that recreates the original land, or would people prefer to keep the land for crop production? The reason these prairies were demolished was because of the fertile ground and potential for crop growth.
What do you think could explain the difference in bacteria population across the different samples? How do authentic do you think these bacteria populations are to what the land use to be? After years of treatment and environment changes due to humans, from planting to power plants emissions, it's hard to imagine that the bacteria fully represents what the microbes use to be, but it gives a good starting point.
View the article here
View the article here